Influx Insights Tag Feed: amazon
http://influxinsights.com/blog/
2008-11-21T10:57:25Zthe demise of the expert
http://influxinsights.com/blog/article/1771/the-demise-of-the-expert.html
If the continuing financial crisis has told us one thing, it’s that you can’t trust the experts. Everywhere you look supposed experts and authority figures seem to have been clueless; from the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/25/business/rate.php">ratings agencies</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/01/feds-folly-fool.html">to governments</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.afp.com/english/news/stories/080126141856.rbwz2qs2.html">senior officers and large financial corporations. </a><br><br>It appears the experts where on a “lunch break” when we needed them most.<br><br>Perhaps the world has gotten too complex for experts and they need to band together in complex neural nets to have a grasp of what’s happening. <br><br>In other areas, it also seems that experts aren’t all that they appear to be. In a new era of community participation, individuals can emerge as de-facto experts, providing them have the ‘chops” and are seen by the community to be making valid contributions.<br><br>The concept has considerable appeal because they appear to have the “secret sauce” of objectivity. Amazon is often sited as the best example of this community of experts, where reviews are given great currency and can be massively persuasive in generating sales. However, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2182002/pagenum/2/">according to Slate</a>, these critics appear to be suffering because they have stressful full-time jobs, they’ve become the people they were supposed to replace and their skills and objectivity have to be called into question. <br><i><b><br>"However, by refashioning Web 2.0 as a proprietary marketplace, Amazon's reviewer rankings subject enthusiasts like Grady Harp to the same pressures that confront the professionals they were supposed to replace. To keep writing, lest another reviewer usurp one's spot. To say something nice, in hopes that someone will say something nice about you. And to read for work, rather than for pleasure. "I have a tall stack of books staring at me," Harp wrote, in a wistful moment."</b></i><br><br>When it becomes a job, who are they working for?<br><br>In fact, the world of the customer review has become a business, you can by a “plug and play” system for your website or brand to help bring that supposedly valued objectivity.<br><br>Everywhere you look it appears the expert is in trouble, bothered by a world that’s now too complex for them to understand or in danger of loosing their objectivity because they are bowing to commercial pressures. <br><br>In an expertless world, who should we be listening to?<br><br><br><br>Posted by Ed CottonInflux Insights2008-01-26T12:22:32Zusers and their content: from a billion dollars to a merit badge
http://influxinsights.com/blog/article/1732/users-and-their-content--from-a-billion-dollars-to-a-merit-badge.html
In those long past heady days of 2006, there was talk amongst some analysts and bloggers that the creators of user-generated content would be getting paid lots of real cash for their hard work and effort. <br><br>There was a school of thought that said some of the billions should and might be shared amongst those who created the content in the first place. <br><br>There was obviously something of a disparity between the billions of dollars paid for a brand like <b>YouTube</b>, compared to the zero revenue that the creators were getting. <br><br>Critics also pointed figures at <b>Digg</b> for the same reason. <br><br>Of course, everyone was barking up the wrong tree; there's a big difference between valuation/purchase price and advertising revenue. <br><br>Now, on some sites, like YouTube, creators are getting a small slice of advertising revenue. <br><br>However, for most creators of content and given that "most" now includes people who put photos up on a Facebook page, there's no financial reward, just the warm glow of social connectivity. <br><br>So is this new world one where participants get zero reward for their efforts?<br><br>It looks as if some companies are looking to change this and bring in merit badges and virtual/"fools gold". <br><br>Amazon has a newish site called <a target="_blank" href="http://askville.amazon.com/faq.html#_Toc144916238">Askville...</a><br><br><i><b>"Askville is a place where you can share and discuss knowledge
with other people by asking and answering questions on any topic. It’s a
fun place to meet others with similar interests to you and a place where you
can share what you know. You can learn something new everyday or help and
meet others using your knowledge. Askville even helps you learn by giving you
cool tools to help you find information online while you are answering
questions. It’s all about sharing—what you know and what you want
to know—so go ahead and meet someone new today and Askville!"</b></i><br><br>Answer questions on Askville and you will be given Quest Gold, which Amazon is only too happy to state is currently worth even less than the US dollar.<br><i><b><br>"Except for any special limited time redemption offers
that we may make available from time to time, Quest gold are not redeemable for anything at this moment.
Once Questville.com launches we hope to have exciting new ways to
use your Quest gold. Until then, keep on stocking up on your Quest gold!"</b></i><br><br>People are going to be submitting answers and contributing content for the benefit of some potentially worthless virtual currency, albeit with the very cool name of Quest Gold.<br><br>The important thing to consider here is that while the currency has no material value, it still works rather well as a merit system. <br><br>It's much better than nothing because people like points systems, they can compare and compete and get some sort of satisfaction from that. <br><br>It's likely that we will see more merit and point systems around the social networks this year. <br><br>It's now time to forget the dreams of wealth sharing from Web 2.0 and instead realize the best thing the majority of content creators can expect for their efforts, is some virtual currency and a merit badge.<a target="_blank" href="http://gigaom.com/"><br><br>Via GigOm</a><br><br><br><br><br>Posted by Ed CottonInflux Insights2008-01-03T02:57:14Zpeople don't want ads to go away
http://influxinsights.com/blog/article/1448/people-don-t-want-ads-to-go-away.html
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Doubleclick</span> did an interesting piece of research last year, they asked consumers what forms of advertising (media) they thought worthwhile and what they would eliminate. <br><br>The results are somewhat suprising- despite living in a DVR world, only <span style="font-weight: bold;">7% </span>would prefer to eliminate them, less than<span style="font-weight: bold;"> 2%</span> would prefer to eliminate magazine or newspaper ads. They also found these traditional forms of media more worthwhile, than <span style="font-weight: bold;">Amazon</span> recommendations.<br><br>Less worthwhile and in-line for elimination; <span style="font-weight: bold;">telemarketing</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">spam</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold;">pop-up ads that were rated more "evil' than spam.</span><br><br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/edcotton/655377893/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1239/655377893_e8e148f90c_o.jpg" alt="Eliminate Advertising" height="547" width="333"></a><br><br><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bankwatch.com/">Via Bankwatch</a><br><br>Posted by Ed CottonInflux Insights2007-06-29T00:05:32Z